Accession No
1119
Brief Description
chemical slide rule, by John Newman, English, 1st half 19th Century
Origin
England; London; Lisle Street
Maker
Newman, John
Class
calculating; chemistry
Earliest Date
1814
Latest Date
1850
Inscription Date
Material
wood (boxwood)
Dimensions
length 667mm; breadth 39mm; thickness 9mm
Special Collection
Provenance
Donated by Sir Charles Galton Darwin in 11/1951.
Inscription
‘I. Newman. Lisle Street LONDON’ (bottom end)
Description Notes
Boxwood slide rule with names of various elements and water set up left hand side (hydrogen at top, mercury and gold together at bottom). Identical scales on slide and fixed edge, divided 10 - 320, numbered 10, 11, 12...50, 55, 60...100, 110, 120...360; 10 - 30 subdivided to 0.1; 30 - 50 subdivided to 0.2; 50 - 100 subdivided to 0.5; 100 - 300 subdivided to 1; 300 - 320 subdivided to 2.
Reverse plain.
Condition good; complete.
References
Events
Description
In chemical reactions, given compounds always combine in the same weight ratios. In the early nineteenth century the weight ratios of combining substances in chemical reactions were studied extensively and the term ‘chemical equivalents’ was used to defined the proportions in which the common chemical substances (either elements or molecules) combined.
In 1814 the Englishman William Hyde Wollaston proposed using a slide rule from which known chemical equivalents could be read. On the chemical slide rule distances are proportional to the logarithms of the combining quantities, making computations straightforward to find what weights of different chemical substances combine to produce a given product weight (or conversely how much of each material results from decomposition).
Through the nineteenth century the accepted values of chemical equivalents were in a state of constant flux. New elements were being discovered (19 were added during the first quarter of the century) and research continued on the amounts consumed in various chemical reactions. Wollaston’s 1814 slide rule used oxygen = 10 as its base value, the figure chosen as a matter of convenience. Wollaston was yet to be convinced by Dalton’s atomic theory, calling it “purely theoretical” and, therefore, of no use to the “formation of a table adapted to most practical purposes”. Not desirous of “warping my numbers according to an atomic theory” Wollaston thus made oxygen the decimal unit of his scale because oxygen was the most common reactant in numerous important chemical reactions and the number ten was a simple figure to manipulate in calculations.
03/01/2008
Created by: Joshua Nall on 03/01/2008
FM:39563
Images (Click to view full size):